Monday 8 April 2019

The Death Star Exhaust Port and Why You're Wrong About It



The second most mocked element of the first Star Wars trilogy stems from the Death Star, or more specifically how it was beaten. Having a single fighter fly to a space station the size of a moon and defeat seems ridiculous, and sadly that seems to have overshadowed the accomplishment itself. People see this less as an astounding David vs. Goliath moment than a "lol easily blown up lol" accomplishment. As we previously tackled the myth of Stormtroopers being horribly ineffective, so now we're going onto this one.

Now let's just focus on the big bit brought up first and foremost: The exhaust port was two meters wide. Only two meters wide. The film even makes a major point of this with pilots deriding the idea of hitting a target that small, leading to the famous (or infamous) bit of Luke citing how he has shot womp rats from the air despite their small size.

The "two meter" statistic tends to get overlooked in most people's heads, so let's put this into perspective.

This plane's wings are two meters wide:


In fact, the very fighter which shot it down was 12.5 meters long. The tip of the canopy to R2-D2's position is more or less that length. This wasn't simply a small target, this was an obscenely small target, one so minute that it's just wider than some species were tall. Even a Ford Ka is 3.6 meters long, and that is the roller skate of cars. Hell, proton torpedoes themselves were 0.5 meters wide, meaning that even being slightly off while shooting at this target would have left them clipping the side and then detonating.

Shooting at such a small exhaust port would be difficult to hit at the best of times, but then you need to account for the situation in question. To start with, said fighter was moving at speeds of well over 1,000 kph, in a flat out attack run. This is why every pilot was using a targeting computer in their attack, because without computer assistance it would miss entirely. In fact, even with computer assistance and with homing torpedoes, multiple attempts did end up missing each time. People seem to keep treating this as if Luke blew up the thing without any difficulty, seemingly forgetting Red Leader's failed effort or Luke almost making the same error. 

If you re-watch the entire briefing scene from A New Hope, you might notice that General Dodona emphasizes that a "precise hit" is required to strike it. This requires each pilot to effectively be on top of it when firing, meaning that they cannot simply try to eyeball it and hope for the best. So, you already have an insanely small target, which needs to be fired upon while a fighter is moving at full speed, and also in a state where even targeting computers cannot effectively pinpoint them. 

You might be wondering just why they needed to fly down the trench in the first place, and there's an easy reason for that: Guns. The Death Star was riddled with them, to the point where the fighters were having to continually dodge around the various tower emplacements just to reach the start of their attack run. While most were designed to oppose larger ships, the sheer volume of guns alone would be enough to cause the X-Wings serious problems.

If the squadrons did try to approach the exhaust port from above, not only would they be required to hit an insanely small target while dodging gunfire, but they run the risk of making mistakes. The big one would be to fire from a far greater range, at which point the fighters run the risk of blocking the very flaw that the Rebels hope to exploit. At least while flying up the trench itself they benefitted from some basic cover, and a near-miss has a better chance of simply skimming the surface rather than striking the hole and wrecking the entire mission.

The cover of the trench also works to benefit the fighters in other ways, namely preventing the Imperials from using all of their military might against them. The additional cover means that even if they did send the majority of their TIE fighters against the X-Wings they wouldn't be able to so freely target them at once. The trench's angle means that they are largely limited to attacking them from above, in front or behind. Hitting them from the front means that the X-Wings would have a major advantage over the TIEs due to their shields, as each would be shooting at the other from a forward angle. Above is possible, but behind is notably more beneficial due to the X-Wings' limited movement within the trench. Once they do that, however, the gun emplacements cannot fire at them without the risk of overshooting and hitting the fighters behind them.

The risk of engagements from fighters are also a whole new ball-game unto themselves, and it should be notable that most of the Rebels' losses stemmed from fighter attacks. Well, Vader mostly, but I would say that the use of fighters is worthy of mention. The TIEs were better equipped to take down the enemy ships than the guns, after all.

Even if they managed to overcome all of that, there were still a thousand thing which could go wrong. For one thing, the torpedoes themselves still need to travel down an incredibly small exhaust port and reach the main reactor without skimming the sides, detonating prematurely or being blown off course by the thermal exhausts that port was made to vent. This was even the subject of Star Wars: Infinites, where one alternate timeline featured the torpedoes failing to hit their intended target despite entering the port.

Keep in mind, by the end, while hitting the port required no small amount of skill and luck on Luke's part, only his connection to the Force gave him the edge in the end. You know, the closest thing there is to Star Wars' version of God. It not only took a good pilot but divine intervention to overcome this.

Oh, and to even reach that point, all of the following had to be accomplished in a series of actions in months leading up to the attack itself:


Then, even before this, there was a much more direct attempt to attack the Death Star while it was still under construction. Rather than a single wing of fighters, the Rebellion used two hundred X-Wings supported by capital ships in a massed battle. Aside from some superficial damage to a capital ship and the less of less than one hundred TIE fighters, the battle was a complete rout.

This sort of thing is part of why I keep raising an eyebrow at Rogue One's depiction of the exhaust port as a flaw. Were this intended as a flaw to allow the Death Star to be destroyed, it required the Rebels taking such a staggering number of risks and so many deaths that it could barely be accomplished. That's not a mark against the film as a whole, simply the execution of events there. Well, that and Disney's reliance on using memes over the actual information present in the very films they adapt.

To call this an easy victory by exploiting a weakness added by a moron is simply something that you could only do by ignoring everything presented to the audience.

4 comments:

  1. I've always wondered something, couldn't they have just put a grate on it, or maybe a shield?

    I guess the obvious answer to that the rebels would just shoot it off before firing the torpedoes, but I'd still prefer seeing that happen since I don't feel the film does a good enough job at communicating just how hard the mission was. Yeah it's this difficult when you really think about it, but the film presents it as if hitting the mark's the least of their worries. I know you really don't like the Force Awakens, but that's an example where I feel they did this a little better since it would've been impossible for a unit of fliers to get through and destroy it.

    Now that being said, I did not like Rogue One. I don't hate it like I hate The Last Jedi, but I felt the film had a lot of issues, one of which is making the exhaust port an intentional flaw. You'd figure if they main guy behind was really working against the Empire he'd have rigged it to be destroyed the second they tried firing it. That way he would've taken down a lot of Imperials with him (including Vader) and he would've saved countless lives in the process. I also thought the trade-off from all of the events you mentioned to a movie that was so slow and boring that you could edit out half an hour and lose nothing (and that had a lot of scenes that made no sense at all) was a terrible deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. About "Rogue One" making the exhaust port an intentional flaw, I think it said the opposite. The wasn't the exhaust port, but the Death Star reactor going critical to a direct hit. I sought a transcript of the movie, and I found this (from the Galen Erso message intended for Saw Gerrera):

      "Saw, the reactor module, that’s the key. That’s the place I’ve laid my trap. It’s well hidden and unstable, one blast to any part of it will destroy the entire station."

      My undestanding of that message was that, If Galen Erso hadn't intentionally "botched" the reactor design, a proton torpedo throught the exhaust port wouldn't have been able to start the critical reaction which ended blowing the Death Star.

      Delete
    2. I have always wondered a little about that, but every time I tend to come back to the same thing: It must have seemed like a defence which was largely needless. Even if a fighter did reach that point, so many things could easily go wrong that it must have seemed like it was not a threat. I mean, tanks tend to have plenty of defences against HE rounds, rockets and gunfire, but the exhaust pipes tend not to have defenses against someone throwing a cherry bomb up it and managing to somehow hit the engine.

      That said, I do agree largely that the film did have issues in communicating the difficulties involved. It was really only in going back over it that I properly realised just how the odds were stacked against them, or just how easily it could have gone wrong. A little more time could have been spent with more fighters or another failed run, rather than showing most of them suffering more from Vader's attacks than anything else. As for the Force Awakens, honestly, I would say that is fair. Whatever my dislike for the film, I'll agree that it did a better job of presenting that, even after counting the benefits which worked in its favour. It even managed to sidestep the problem that Return of the Jedi had, with certain (possibly unfinished) holes being large enough to fly fighters down.

      As for Rogue One, I'm holding off on judging it for myself. I watched it once, but that was with the advertising over in the UK effectively promoting it as "Band of Brothers: The Star Wars Version" which was a bit of a lie. As such, I'm waiting to forget it and watch it again so I can judge it fairly. As for the flaw though, and the reasoning behind it, judging that is something I'm waiting to watch over and consider further after a couple of repeat viewings. All that I judged it by was how difficult it would have been to exploit this flaw, even without getting into intentional sabotage.

      Though - just to address Agrivar's comment for a moment - That's something i'll need to review for myself, but it would make a bit more sense in that regard. If it was meant to be a weak point which could serve as a start to a fuse even if it was generally struck it COULD be a little more understandable, if a little flawed. It would make more sense of the Rebels to sneak units onto the station to exploit that flaw rather than the attack run if that was the case, and you could at least excuse the squadron attack as an act of desperation given their limited timeframe.

      Delete
  2. Agrivar I include the exhaust port as a part of the intentional flaw because it plays a major part in leading to the intentional collapse of the Death Star. I also call it an intentional flaw because they make it very clear throughout Rogue One that there was a defect in the design of the Death Star and if the Imperials figured out what it was they could fix it. Figuring out what the issue is and then leaving it alone is definitely leaving an intentional flaw in the Death Star's design.

    As for Bellarius, I get that, but tanks don't exactly have the same sort of cost involved, as well as the ranked officers involved, not to mention if the Emperor got onboard. You'd figure they'd want to invest a little more in it rather than write it off as being too unlikely to care about.

    ReplyDelete