You really have to wonder what goes through the heads of Games Workshop writers some days. On some occasions they've produced fantastic, outstanding work which shows just why Warhammer 40,000 is the granddaddy of all tabletop wargaming. Then you have monuments, staggering monolithic works raised above all else which all but scream "There was a point, we bloody well missed it!" Guess which one this is.
Right off of the bat, let's get the first point established shall we? There's no expansions to prior lore. Unlike what people had hoped for, the writers do little to nothing with the craftworlds and we learn no new details about them. Nothing which past books didn't tell, no new revelations about their society or their nature, nor even a little more to the big name ones themselves.
Just about every craftworld here is stuck, yet again, with about two or three paragraphs to flesh them out, just about all of which emphasise upon nothing but the militarized side of things. Beil-Tan is still the Fascist state of the eldar race, Saim-Hann is still woefully underdeveloped, Alaitoc is Ranger Town once more (with a tacked on Necron Dynasty vendetta), nothing of importance happened to Iyanden prior to Kraken apparently, and Ulthwé has little else to it beyond "Chaos is coming, look busy!"
Even the minor craftworlds, those rarely seen, remain woefully underrepresented and lack much to help truly define them. Given even less space than the major craftworlds, each effectively boils down to one or two sections or ideas with little room to develop or help represent their way of life. Of those there, only Lugganath and Mymeara remain relatively well rounded, with the others focusing far too much upon a single recent, defining event or their warhost. Few even bother to go so far as to actually account for any battles, victories or the mass slaughters their kind are so frequently subjugated to thanks to lazy writing, and we're just stuck with the same cookie-cutter descriptions as last time.
So many subtle elements or essential parts of the race's mythos are either overlooked, underutilised or barely commented upon at all. To give one quick example, the Rhana Dandra isn't mentioned at all in the book beyond a brief comparison by Nightspear. Atop of this, so many crucial ideas such as the fact Autarchs and Exarchs are accursed as much as blessed (trapped on their Path and ultimately at a dead end) is completely overlooked, as is any real relationship between the craftworlds and Exodite colonies. The many opportunities to do so are squandered so badly it's astounding to think that Games Workshop thought the book deserved this price tag. The actual lore, on the whole, is so bare bones that were you to remove the obvious padding and relentlessly repeated information, it would barely make up a third of its overall page count - and that's before getting to the actual damn padding!
In the codex's middle, from page fifty-seven to ninety-three, the entire damn armybook suddenly diverges to immediately spam images of model upon model. With pointless close-ups of armies over and over again, some of the worst painted minitures ever to bear the 'Eavy Metal logo (honestly, I know casual painters who could have produced a masterpiece compared to Yriel here) and some quite obvious photoshopped efforts to make certain units look imposing. Oh, but that's only after the book opts to repeat all the details and information about the craftworlds and Aspect Shrines it just showed the reader right before this section. This would be like reading the same chapter twice over in a novel, only for the characters to be wearing hats the second time around. Repeating information to pad out their books has long been a sin Games Workshop has wholeheartedly embraced, but this is just getting ridiculous by this point!
An examination of the psychic power of the eldar.
Descriptions on how the eldar manipulate other races and alter fate to ensure their own survival.
How the craftworlds have drifted apart.
Why the craftworlds have drifted apart and how some distrust others.
Lengthy campaigns and wars against their foes.
The race's role on the galactic stage and how they have participated in major wars.
How Craftworld and Dark Eldar interact with one another.
The various ruins, vaults and seals left by their race all over the galaxy, desperately trying to hold Chaos at bay.
Victories.
No, sadly that last one is not an exaggeration. Go through this book and you'll find few to no actual wins made by any eldar army. Or any actual damn battles described involving the eldar army. "Show don't tell" is supposed to be one of the basic rules when it comes to showing off anything, from events to character abilities, so how the hell does Games Workshop keep getting this so utterly wrong? It's been bad enough on some previous books where they've gutted any actual stories of battles or campaigns, but now it seems even giving the army a player might be interested in a genuine win is utterly out of the question.
The writers' determination to utterly deny the eldar any kind of victory or glory moment can be best seen in the book's timeline. As if the title "The Doom of the Eldar" wasn't damning enough, what follows is a veritable plague of retreats, draws and losses without end.
The entire opening section completely skips over anything of significant detail surrounding the Empire, and just opts to detail the bare basics of how it fell, then starts skipping forwards a few millennia, coveringly only a few known tibbits from the Horus Heresy. Then the real defeats start.
764.M34 is titled the Shattering of Lugganath, and contains the following:
"The Emperor's Children ravage Craftworld Lugganath in Slannesh's name, killing thousands of Eldar before the are repelled."
514.M38 has this lovely bit to it:
"The Eldar of Ulthwé and the Jade Knife Kabal of Commorragh battle for dominance within the shattered spars of the webway. An uneasy truce is called only when the death toll becomes unbearable."
794.M41 contains Khorne's pets running wild on a craftworld:
"Caelec the Wanderer breaches a sealed runic portal, only to find it leads of Khorne's realm. A warband of hound-headed fiends slays Caelec and follows his scent to Yme-Loc, causing utter carnage before it is finally banished to the ether."
Oh, and we can't go without the Imperium getting involved in 801.M41 with a lovely side dish of character assassination:
"When Craftworld Yme-Loc refuses to yield its secrets to an Adeptus Mechanicus war fleet, battle breaks out within the armouries of Vaul. Millions die before the Tech-Priests seize enough Eldar technology to sate their predatory curiosity."
... You know, you'd be forgiven for thinking someone on the writing team might not be the biggest fan of this army.
The only things the eldar actually get as victories are stuff lifted wholesale from the most recent codices and Valedor, which even then seem to emphasise as much on eldar losses as possible. That and also open up some very big questions such as noting that certain craftworlds (Iyanden going from what the timeline suggests) set up multiple planetary colonies away from their mobile fortress planets. That and the fact said mobile fortress cities of psychic bone and raw firepower can easily be plundered by anyone looking to have a bit of fun at the space elves' expense. That or someone read the praise given to codices willingness to show armies losing once in a while, and used this as an excuse to go curb stomp the eldar into the dirt!
Perhaps the single worst thing though is how the codex utterly abandons any opportunity to detail lengthy conflicts, campaigns or even major battles for a few pages. Every shred of info here is delivered piecemeal and without any degree of lengthy explanation, and for all the conflicts it alludes to we see absolutely none of this. So, as a result even the very angle the book is going for in trying to only focus upon the eldar as an army is still woefully underrepresented and astoundingly shallow when it comes to any depictions of war.
On the lore front Codex: Eldar Craftworlds is more a massive missed opportunity. It fails to expand upon anything we previously knew, fails to actually give any substantial focus to any of the major craftworlds, fails to account for even a fraction of the army's history or concepts, and fails to expand upon the basic army itself. With Codex: Space Marines showing how a book could be divided up to best represent several sub-factions and Codex: Tau Empire building a real society while still focusing primarily upon its army, there were no excuses here. While it might not be the gibbering realm of madness which was the last Supplement, this was just unimpressive as an effort. Honestly, you'd really do better just to save your money if you're in it for the background history and lore.
Still, that's only half the codex. Next time we delve into the rules. Oh sweet Emperor, the rules.
the rules omg a wriath knight killedmy imperialknight on 1 turn and then killed 300 points of my army before he went down , underpriced as fuq! how did that even passed testing!
ReplyDeleteThat's something the review is actually going to go into, why this thing was written the way it was and a few theories on what Games Workshop were thinking. Besides the obvious.
DeleteOh wow, when I saw that all the units had their generic names I just thought they were too lazy to list them under their own craftworld, but that it would still be somewhat like Daemonkin in that they were going to list all of the units so that you could still use them (even if they weren't a part or should have been a part of that craftworld). I genuinely didn't expect this to be Codex: Eldar (7th edition) because they actually did make a Craftworlds Codex in the past.
ReplyDeleteThat's a real shame most of the fluff is just copy-pasted (I believe this is actually the second time this has happened, if I remember right 4th edition did the same thing with 2nd editions fluff), and I kind of get why the Eldar are given a lot of defeats, it seems to me the writers thought that it just goes hand-in-hand with their reclusive nature. They don't seek out battles because they're dying out (or so I'm told) and therefore they can only repel attackers. Having said this I think a few defeats are necessary for giving the army character (as there is no character in a faction that can only win) and this idea ignores them fighting for the Maiden Worlds and all of the Necron Tomb Worlds that the Eldar have crushed, funnily enough both 5th edition Necrons and 7th edition Necrons mention this happening, why it is forgotten here is beyond me.
Now I'm going to make a prediction with the rules, I have not seen the rules I have not seen any of them aside from the updates the Wraithguard and Waveserpents have gotten. I'm going to guess they've only added additional benefits onto everyone else, single wound models are now multi-wound (I'm guessing the jetbikes have this upgrade), some of the Elite units have had massive price cuts, and the Eldar can still very easily gain extremely high re-rollable (2+ even) cover saves along with retaining their very high manoeuvrability. If they did do this then at the very least it'll be able to challenge the current Necron Codex (which is also ridiculously powerful, to the point that I don't know how people could lose barring bad luck).
You realize that Eldar is the strongest codex this edition so far, yes? It's not "at least it'll be able to challenge" Decurion Crons, it's "Someone help me where did all my Necrons go?"
DeleteEldar have so much Destroyer-strength weaponry it's not even funny.
D-strength weapons on infantry? Does GW even *read* the things they sell any more?
DeleteWell, to answer your points in turn, the real problem here is that the book starts to build up the eldar as some massively powerful force, starts to place emphasis upon their skill, but the actual conflicts are just defeats or completely muted. There is actually one very brief mention of an Eldar victory by killing a (sleeping) Tomb World, which is the closest the book gets to a serious eldar victory beyond Iyanden and one or two tyranid incursions. The problem is that this is immediately followed by the eldar realising their victory meant nothing because this was one small part of a massive empire.
DeleteTo make matters worse, the only one who seems to actually pay attention to the threat the Necron Dynasties at all now is Alaitoc and whole sections of the book either hinge purely upon The Fall or allude to half seen things the writers never actually take any time to do anything with. For example, the book actually confirms that the Eldar foresaw the full scale of the Tyranid threat hundreds of years before Hive Fleet Kraken's arrival. It also notes that there was a massive gathering of Autarchs from almost all the known Craftworlds who came to the decree that the lesser races should be shown their place by the eldar. What does the book do with either revelation? Bugger all. They're forgotten almost as soon as they are introduced, ignoring the massive impact these revelations should have. This is not to mention that the authors are completely forgetting that (besides Path of the Eldar) attacking a craftworld is supposed to be tantamount to suicide. Biel-Tan in particular was noted to have single handedly crippled an entire Segmentum battlefleet with assistance from multiple chapters when they tried to invade it. It's the reason that the likes of Ulthwe and others are more or less tolerated to a degree rather than hounded across the stars.
As for the rules, yes and no. You're certainly right on a very very irritating points but there's an odd kind of logic to certain changes and details. Some might be good on their own and would be beneficial in most cases, but the way the writers have gone about it just turns this into a complete atrocity of a book.
It was a bit before I could see this book myself and I was surprised at how some of the lore was actually cut to make room for the artwork, for example Maugan Ra and his craftworld have had their lore (what little there was) significantly cut down, this might have been something if it wasn't for the artwork being shoddy, I do not consider myself a great painter (some of the people I know have entered pro-painting contests and against them I'm nothing, though I've been doing it for a few years) but recently I finished painting Mortarion and even that puts most of the 'Eavy Metal showcase to shame. I guess nobody making this book cared at all, what isn't copy-paste is blatantly broken (barring the banshees).
ReplyDeleteOh agreed entirely on all points. The problem is that the book seemed to be keeping to the bare basics at the absolute most and trying to use flashier or more immediately outstanding elements to keep a reader's attention. I was somewhat willing to forgive Daemonkin and Harlequins over lacking military campaigns or the like as they were supporting codices for an army, but if this is supposed to be the main Craftworld Eldar codex it is ridiculously lacking. Perhaps the single worst account was the fact they kept completely overlooking ideas or points which could easily help to flesh them out, such as some of the new ideas surrounding the possible revival of the Eldar Pantheon or greater details about The Fall. Hell, even manipulating the orks into attacking Armageddon would be fine, but all were skimmed over entirely.
DeletePersonally, I think this poor quality is down to demand sadly. I'm hoping to write something up on this, but there's been such a barrage of releases recently, month after month, that some are visibly starting to suffer in the worst ways possible.